Comparison of XTAG and LEXSYS grammars
نویسنده
چکیده
We use the Lexicalised D-Tree Grammar (LDTG) formalism (Rambow et al. 95), which is based on the Lexicalized Tree Adjoining Grammar (LTAG) formalism. In LDTG, there are two types of edges between nodes: d-edges, represented with a broken line, and p-edges, represented by a solid line. Trees are combined by two substitution-like operations, both of which involve combining two descriptions, by equating exactly one node from each description. One of the operations is always used to add complements, and involves equating a frontier node (in the d-tree that is getting the complement) with the root of some component (in the d-tree that is providing the complement ), such that the two nodes being equated are compatible . An example of substitution is shown in Figure 1.
منابع مشابه
Parsing with an Extended Domain of Locality
One of the claimed benefits of Tree Adjoining Grammars is that they have an extended domain of locality (EDOL). We consider how this can be exploited to limit the need for feature structure unification during parsing. We compare two wide-coverage lexicalized grammars of English, LEXSYS and XTAG, finding that the two grammars exploit EDOL in different ways.
متن کاملA comparison of the XTAG and CLE Grammars for English
When people develop something intended as a large broad-coverage grammar, they usually have a more specific goal in mind. Sometimes this goal is covering a corpus; sometimes the developers have theoretical ideas they wish to investigate; most often, work is driven by a combination of these two main types of goal. What tends to happen after a while is that the community of people working with th...
متن کاملA Comparison of the XTAG and CLE Grammars
When people develop something intended as a !arge broad-coverage grammar, they usually have a more specific goal in mind. Sometimes this goal is covering a corpus; sometimes the developers have theoretical ideas they wish to investigate; most often, work is driven by a combination of these two main types of goal. What tends to happen after a while is that the community of people working with th...
متن کاملComparing and integrating Tree Adjoining Grammars
Grammars are core elements of many NLP applications. Grammars can be developed in two ways: built by hand or extracted from corpora. In this paper, we compare a handcrajted grammar with a Treebank grammar. We contend that recognizing substructures of the grammars' basic units is necessary tures and semantic information which are rarely represented in the corpora. lt would be ideal if we could c...
متن کاملA compact encoding of a DTG grammar
This paper describes the use of a compact encoding scheme to represent the trees of the wide-coverage DTG grammar currently being developed in the LEXSYS project (Caroll et al 1998). The encoding scheme is derived from the scheme for LTAG grammars described in Evans, Gazdar and Weir (1995), but the LEXSYS grammar is the first attempt to apply these ideas on a !arger scale. In this paper we repo...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 1998